Is Fur In Latin Plural Or Singular Does Anyone Know Any Latin?

Does anyone know any Latin? - is fur in latin plural or singular

OK, so I tried to ask this question a while ago, and I am always safe. I want to know, as you say, "Thief of Dreams" in America when someone who steals dreams (do not ask me why, it's) a long story and I'm sure Ereptor Somnium may be used, and possible skin Somnium ( Skin spelling), but I had some people say that Ereptor, even though I can not understand why. I prefer the former because it sounds better in the language, the people especially to tell me whether can Somnium Ereptor used, to mean "Dream Thief. If not, why not?

Thank you in advance.

2 comments:

Hubert D said...

I suspect that ereptor thief) (thief, could mean, but I doubt you would with a named person to make compound words. I think it is easier to genitive.

I just want to say:
"Somniorum Skins"

Thief of dreams. I do not know. One could say that "ereptor Somniorum" or whatever you want. It does not matter. Only in Latin.

dollhaus said...

Probably not, because it is generally regarded as a word for "thief" is used in Latin. It is a word from the verb "eripio formed", meaning "take, take by force, to save," which translates into more like a "thief".

America had more words to the thief - skin (not fur), furator, trifur, Clepto - but not ereptor.

Post a Comment